<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Saudi Prince? Why Not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/10/02/a-saudi-prince-why-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/10/02/a-saudi-prince-why-not/</link>
	<description>A blog by insiders for outsiders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:30:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohammad-Saudi Arabia</title>
		<link>http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/10/02/a-saudi-prince-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-18778</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohammad-Saudi Arabia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/?p=2153#comment-18778</guid>
		<description>First of all, I want to thank you for this article. Second, I agree with you on everything. But I am disappointed from some of the comments that reflect that people just follow the media, which is most of the time is aggressive on middle eastern countries, without making sure from their resources. Also, I don&#039;t know why people get politics involved in everything in their lives. Also, it does not mean that we do not vote, or women cannot drive, that we don&#039;t have human rights. I hope some people could understand that our culture is different than western culture. And Saudi Arabia does not have to follow you in everything you do!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I want to thank you for this article. Second, I agree with you on everything. But I am disappointed from some of the comments that reflect that people just follow the media, which is most of the time is aggressive on middle eastern countries, without making sure from their resources. Also, I don&#8217;t know why people get politics involved in everything in their lives. Also, it does not mean that we do not vote, or women cannot drive, that we don&#8217;t have human rights. I hope some people could understand that our culture is different than western culture. And Saudi Arabia does not have to follow you in everything you do!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rax262</title>
		<link>http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/10/02/a-saudi-prince-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-15619</link>
		<dc:creator>rax262</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/?p=2153#comment-15619</guid>
		<description>Right or wrong I think NASCAR will lose fans over this.  The concerning trend here is not that a member of the Saudi royal family owns a part of a once iconic team, but that a majority stake holder in that team with no historical ties to the sport essentially sold his interest to the highest bidder. 

George Gillett is a businessman and he sees fit to do with his money as he pleases.  His stake in Evernham was just an investment and it&#039;s no surprise that he dumped his share when an interested party came knocking, it happens every day on Wall Street and Main Street.   

That said the thing that won’t sit well with fans is realization that the days of familial ownership are over.  Portions of a team can be bought and sold and the current owner may bear no ties which prevent him from selling his stake and he may do so with little care of the long term effect on the sport.

As a fan of many forms for motor racing I understand that while these cars run on gasoline the teams run on money, and lots of it.  The dependence upon sponsorship and rich benefactors will always be a part of motorsports.  Some folks believe that “any money is good money” and I don’t begrudge them for that belief, however I feel that they should carefully consider the source their funds. 

When you enter into a business relationship you associate yourself with them. Be it a Saudi royal, Texas oil man, or good ole boy in Kannapolis, you and your reputation as a team will be judged by the company you keep.  To see this look no further than GM and Chrysler who’ve experienced double digit declines in sales after  bankruptcy and bail outs compared to Ford who thus far has avoided government aid.

At the end of the day fans will look at these teams with multiple stake holders and ask themselves if this is the NASCAR they know and love.  Unfortunately some fans will not like what they see and will drift away from the sport.  The question that this raises in my mind is whether this new era of ownership will attract new fans.  In my opinion it will not, but it will sustain the sport through these dark times.  If RPM is Richard Petty in name only then so be it, at least it will keep cars on the track.  However don’t be surprised when fans turn elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right or wrong I think NASCAR will lose fans over this.  The concerning trend here is not that a member of the Saudi royal family owns a part of a once iconic team, but that a majority stake holder in that team with no historical ties to the sport essentially sold his interest to the highest bidder. </p>
<p>George Gillett is a businessman and he sees fit to do with his money as he pleases.  His stake in Evernham was just an investment and it&#8217;s no surprise that he dumped his share when an interested party came knocking, it happens every day on Wall Street and Main Street.   </p>
<p>That said the thing that won’t sit well with fans is realization that the days of familial ownership are over.  Portions of a team can be bought and sold and the current owner may bear no ties which prevent him from selling his stake and he may do so with little care of the long term effect on the sport.</p>
<p>As a fan of many forms for motor racing I understand that while these cars run on gasoline the teams run on money, and lots of it.  The dependence upon sponsorship and rich benefactors will always be a part of motorsports.  Some folks believe that “any money is good money” and I don’t begrudge them for that belief, however I feel that they should carefully consider the source their funds. </p>
<p>When you enter into a business relationship you associate yourself with them. Be it a Saudi royal, Texas oil man, or good ole boy in Kannapolis, you and your reputation as a team will be judged by the company you keep.  To see this look no further than GM and Chrysler who’ve experienced double digit declines in sales after  bankruptcy and bail outs compared to Ford who thus far has avoided government aid.</p>
<p>At the end of the day fans will look at these teams with multiple stake holders and ask themselves if this is the NASCAR they know and love.  Unfortunately some fans will not like what they see and will drift away from the sport.  The question that this raises in my mind is whether this new era of ownership will attract new fans.  In my opinion it will not, but it will sustain the sport through these dark times.  If RPM is Richard Petty in name only then so be it, at least it will keep cars on the track.  However don’t be surprised when fans turn elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journo</title>
		<link>http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/10/02/a-saudi-prince-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-15617</link>
		<dc:creator>Journo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/?p=2153#comment-15617</guid>
		<description>Steve- I don&#039;t believe Janet was tarring anyone. She was pointing out the very same thing I saw. A lot of very ignorant, misinformed, hateful comments from people who dislike this man simply because he&#039;s not from this country. I&#039;ve seen no legitimate reasons, on our comment section or any other comment section, why this guy shouldn&#039;t be involved in this sport or any other. It&#039;s xenophobia in all it&#039;s shining glory. &#039;We don&#039;t want him in OUR sport because he&#039;s not like us.&#039; That&#039;s wrong.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve- I don&#8217;t believe Janet was tarring anyone. She was pointing out the very same thing I saw. A lot of very ignorant, misinformed, hateful comments from people who dislike this man simply because he&#8217;s not from this country. I&#8217;ve seen no legitimate reasons, on our comment section or any other comment section, why this guy shouldn&#8217;t be involved in this sport or any other. It&#8217;s xenophobia in all it&#8217;s shining glory. &#8216;We don&#8217;t want him in OUR sport because he&#8217;s not like us.&#8217; That&#8217;s wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/10/02/a-saudi-prince-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-15608</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/?p=2153#comment-15608</guid>
		<description>Journo: you&#039;d have lost the bet (was it for lunch?), but notwithstanding that he wasn&#039;t unknown to those who spend too much time on-line following sports news, I don&#039;t think I should only have been able to object to his involvement in NASCAR if I had pre-existing knowledge of him and not on the basis of research done upon learning his name.

Janet: there are always going to be nuts on the fringe of any activity, please don&#039;t tar us all because some resort to knee-jerk xenophobia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journo: you&#8217;d have lost the bet (was it for lunch?), but notwithstanding that he wasn&#8217;t unknown to those who spend too much time on-line following sports news, I don&#8217;t think I should only have been able to object to his involvement in NASCAR if I had pre-existing knowledge of him and not on the basis of research done upon learning his name.</p>
<p>Janet: there are always going to be nuts on the fringe of any activity, please don&#8217;t tar us all because some resort to knee-jerk xenophobia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journo</title>
		<link>http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/10/02/a-saudi-prince-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-15542</link>
		<dc:creator>Journo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 01:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/?p=2153#comment-15542</guid>
		<description>Janet- Thank you. I love this sport, and have nothing but respect for Richard Petty. I find this ignorant, hateful, misinformed ranting disheartening to say the least. I still have hope the sport can move beyond this sort of thing though. These moments are not NASCAR&#039;s finest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janet- Thank you. I love this sport, and have nothing but respect for Richard Petty. I find this ignorant, hateful, misinformed ranting disheartening to say the least. I still have hope the sport can move beyond this sort of thing though. These moments are not NASCAR&#8217;s finest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Q Private</title>
		<link>http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/10/02/a-saudi-prince-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-15538</link>
		<dc:creator>John Q Private</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/?p=2153#comment-15538</guid>
		<description>Consider that change that&#039;s occurring within NASCAR the last few years. Look at all the mergers, minority/majority interest owners, buyouts, consolidation, etc. Now compare it to this situation. Gillette &quot;buys a stake&quot; in Evernham. Okay, no problem...it&#039;s the fad of the moment. With Evernham absorbed now it&#039;s on to &quot;buying a stake&quot; in Petty. Now the Gillette conglomeration is absorbing Yates Racing. Now on top of absorbing 3 heritage teams (albeit failing to keep up with the Joneses type teams) Gillette is selling a portion to an interest on the other side of the world.

Some may see fresh money coming into the sport. I see NASCAR as a whole - sanctioning body, owners, teams and to an extent, drivers - prostituting themselves for *any* penny they can lay their hands on. Everyday something happens that takes away a little piece from the days when racing was racing and not this glossy primped up WWE/Disney-ified crap that&#039;s showcased on Sunday afternoons or the occasional Saturday night.

Everyday, every little bit of what could be defined as &quot;America&quot; is sold off piecemeal. Jobs going to China (and to a lesser extent Mexico) and the Saudi&#039;s buying up our remnants. Everyday, the average Joe Schmoe American has less and less to identify with and even NASCAR is selling their portion to the highest bidder. Real Americans don&#039;t trust big corporations and big money - even now more than ever with the economic problems caused by corporate greed - and that is exactly what NASCAR has become. 

Now read what I wrote, think about it, then get back to me about why NASCAR&#039;s ratings are slipping and the empty seats at the track despite Brian France&#039;s &quot;What, me worry?&quot; tense smile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider that change that&#8217;s occurring within NASCAR the last few years. Look at all the mergers, minority/majority interest owners, buyouts, consolidation, etc. Now compare it to this situation. Gillette &#8220;buys a stake&#8221; in Evernham. Okay, no problem&#8230;it&#8217;s the fad of the moment. With Evernham absorbed now it&#8217;s on to &#8220;buying a stake&#8221; in Petty. Now the Gillette conglomeration is absorbing Yates Racing. Now on top of absorbing 3 heritage teams (albeit failing to keep up with the Joneses type teams) Gillette is selling a portion to an interest on the other side of the world.</p>
<p>Some may see fresh money coming into the sport. I see NASCAR as a whole &#8211; sanctioning body, owners, teams and to an extent, drivers &#8211; prostituting themselves for *any* penny they can lay their hands on. Everyday something happens that takes away a little piece from the days when racing was racing and not this glossy primped up WWE/Disney-ified crap that&#8217;s showcased on Sunday afternoons or the occasional Saturday night.</p>
<p>Everyday, every little bit of what could be defined as &#8220;America&#8221; is sold off piecemeal. Jobs going to China (and to a lesser extent Mexico) and the Saudi&#8217;s buying up our remnants. Everyday, the average Joe Schmoe American has less and less to identify with and even NASCAR is selling their portion to the highest bidder. Real Americans don&#8217;t trust big corporations and big money &#8211; even now more than ever with the economic problems caused by corporate greed &#8211; and that is exactly what NASCAR has become. </p>
<p>Now read what I wrote, think about it, then get back to me about why NASCAR&#8217;s ratings are slipping and the empty seats at the track despite Brian France&#8217;s &#8220;What, me worry?&#8221; tense smile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rain</title>
		<link>http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/10/02/a-saudi-prince-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-15537</link>
		<dc:creator>rain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/?p=2153#comment-15537</guid>
		<description>Steve- I&#039;m shocked at how naive some people are.

Journo- You (and others) missed the point completely that Steve and I were trying to make. Let&#039;s let it go...as you said, this isn&#039;t the site for a foreign policy debate.  

But you did sort of ask for it..  lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve- I&#8217;m shocked at how naive some people are.</p>
<p>Journo- You (and others) missed the point completely that Steve and I were trying to make. Let&#8217;s let it go&#8230;as you said, this isn&#8217;t the site for a foreign policy debate.  </p>
<p>But you did sort of ask for it..  lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet</title>
		<link>http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/10/02/a-saudi-prince-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-15536</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/?p=2153#comment-15536</guid>
		<description>Journo I too applaud you for writing this.

I think that you hit the nail on the head. Some of the comments that I have read on different RPM fan sites and other places make me shudder at what people have said. 

I am a longtime Petty fan and am thankful that you have said what I and many others are thinking. 

Peace,
Janet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journo I too applaud you for writing this.</p>
<p>I think that you hit the nail on the head. Some of the comments that I have read on different RPM fan sites and other places make me shudder at what people have said. </p>
<p>I am a longtime Petty fan and am thankful that you have said what I and many others are thinking. </p>
<p>Peace,<br />
Janet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journo</title>
		<link>http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/10/02/a-saudi-prince-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-15527</link>
		<dc:creator>Journo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 19:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/?p=2153#comment-15527</guid>
		<description>Steve- Because I&#039;m willing to bet you&#039;d never heard of this guy before this hit the news.

Zieke- Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve- Because I&#8217;m willing to bet you&#8217;d never heard of this guy before this hit the news.</p>
<p>Zieke- Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zieke</title>
		<link>http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/10/02/a-saudi-prince-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-15518</link>
		<dc:creator>Zieke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/?p=2153#comment-15518</guid>
		<description>Journo, What we have here is something to spout off about, without knowing much of the subject. Take most of these with a grain of salt, and keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journo, What we have here is something to spout off about, without knowing much of the subject. Take most of these with a grain of salt, and keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

