Comments on: The NASCAR Week That Was: July 12-18 http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/07/18/the-nascar-week-that-was-july-12-18/ A blog by insiders for outsiders Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:03:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Doug in CA http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/07/18/the-nascar-week-that-was-july-12-18/comment-page-1/#comment-10724 Doug in CA Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:34:34 +0000 http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/?p=1820#comment-10724 Thank you, John. Could Mayfield be in denial? Of course he could. The whole point of my post was to say that I don't have the foggiest. And I don't. It's great drama, though, especially with the stepmother jumping in. They pay people in Hollywood big bucks to come up with this stuff, but NASCAR gets it for free! Well, not really - they're paying lawyers, not screenwriters... Thank you, John. Could Mayfield be in denial? Of course he could. The whole point of my post was to say that I don’t have the foggiest. And I don’t. It’s great drama, though, especially with the stepmother jumping in. They pay people in Hollywood big bucks to come up with this stuff, but NASCAR gets it for free! Well, not really – they’re paying lawyers, not screenwriters…

]]> By: John Q Private http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/07/18/the-nascar-week-that-was-july-12-18/comment-page-1/#comment-10665 John Q Private Mon, 20 Jul 2009 01:30:37 +0000 http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/?p=1820#comment-10665 Mayfield "says" while producing no hard copy evidence? NASCAR breaking the chain of evidence on a drug sample and facing massive civil and possible criminal ramifications? Mayfield couldn't be in denial or fall into the "methinks the lady doth protest too much" category, huh? Please re-examine your post and thought process. Mayfield “says” while producing no hard copy evidence? NASCAR breaking the chain of evidence on a drug sample and facing massive civil and possible criminal ramifications? Mayfield couldn’t be in denial or fall into the “methinks the lady doth protest too much” category, huh?

Please re-examine your post and thought process.

]]> By: marc http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/07/18/the-nascar-week-that-was-july-12-18/comment-page-1/#comment-10659 marc Mon, 20 Jul 2009 01:04:59 +0000 http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/?p=1820#comment-10659 Doug, I agree, there's more than meets the eye. But when your eyes' settle on the FDA's <a href="http://tinyurl.com/mkeec7" rel="nofollow">search function</a> it turns up a butt load of warnings and other not so nice things issued to LabCorp. Not to mention a multi-million dollar lawsuit they were <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/12520" rel="nofollow">partially responsible for</a>. Doug, I agree, there’s more than meets the eye.

But when your eyes’ settle on the FDA’s search function it turns up a butt load of warnings and other not so nice things issued to LabCorp.

Not to mention a multi-million dollar lawsuit they were partially responsible for.

]]> By: Doug in CA http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/07/18/the-nascar-week-that-was-july-12-18/comment-page-1/#comment-10646 Doug in CA Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:08:08 +0000 http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/?p=1820#comment-10646 This Mayfield stuff is amazing. Now he says a second test, an hour later, was clean. Did NASCAR spike the first test? Would YOU put it past them? I wouldn't. Mayfield knows whether he does meth. I don't see why he'd fight this so hard if he knew he was a meth head. There's far more to this than meets the eye, I think. This Mayfield stuff is amazing. Now he says a second test, an hour later, was clean. Did NASCAR spike the first test? Would YOU put it past them? I wouldn’t. Mayfield knows whether he does meth. I don’t see why he’d fight this so hard if he knew he was a meth head.

There’s far more to this than meets the eye, I think.

]]>