As I sat here this evening trying to decide what I was going to write about I couldn’t help but think of the almost daily bad news coming down on Jeremy Mayfield. Now I’m not going to talk about his guilt or innocence here. It is frankly irrelevant to the post. But I thought it might be interesting to look at what Mayfield is now facing.
On May 9 Jeremy Mayfield was suspended indefinitely by NASCAR for failing a drug test administered to him at Richmond. NASCAR refused to name the drug/s Mayfield tested positive for.
As the week progressed Mayfield claimed he failed the test over a mixture of Claritin-D and a prescription drug. NASCAR drug test administrator Dr. David Black of Aegis Sciences Corporation said that was impossible.
Fast forward, Mayfield and attorney Bill Diehl filed suit against NASCAR seeking among other things a temporary restraining order that would allow Mayfield to compete. A Mecklenburg County judge heard the case May 29. He denied Mayfield’s request. During the hearing we learned the driver was taking Adderall for ADHD and Claritin-D. According to NASCAR there was a third drug they did not name. Mayfield’s attorneys did not submit the toxicology report.
Prior to bringing the case before a Mecklenburg County judge the following week NASCAR requested the case be moved to Federal Court. The request was granted.
On June 5, NASCAR countersued Mayfield in Federal Court claiming willful violation of the substance abuse policy, breach of contract, and defrauding competitors of earnings. The suit claims Mayfield failed to notify Dr. David Black of his change in prescriptions in accordance with the drug policy and also that he defrauded his fellow competitors of $150,000.
ESPN the Magazine’s Ryan McGee, reported on June 9 that he had confirmed with two independent sources that the illegal drug Mayfield tested positive for was Methamphetamine. This allegedly was the third drug that showed up on Mayfield’s failed test.
This week chassis and engine builder Triad Racing Technologies filed suit in North Carolina Superior Court against Jeremy Mayfield Motorsports for $86,000. They claim they were not paid for parts and services rendered.
On top of this, NASCAR filed a motion in federal court on Tuesday alleging the expert witness used in Mayfield’s lawsuit lied about his credentials. Among other things NASCAR claims Dr. Harvey MacFenerstein did not have medical degrees or certifications he claimed to have. MacFenerstein claims he told Mayfield attorney John Buric the qualifications listed in the affidavit were incorrect and Buric assured him they would be corrected. NASCAR is asking for reimbursement in defending itself against Mayfield, that MacFenerstein’s testimony be dismissed, and that Mayfield’s attorney’s be sanctioned for failing to conduct a reasonable inquiry into MacFenerstein’s credentials.
Now I’m no legal expert, but I think it’s fair to say Mayfield is in it up to his neck. He has one lawsuit against NASCAR (which looks now to be on very shaky legs) and two separate lawsuits against him. Not to mention Mayfield’s means for making money has been cut off. On top of this he is financing a legal team headed by Bill Diehl which I can tell you is not cheap.
They say hindsight is 20/20 and I’m guessing Mayfield is beginning to wish he hadn’t taken on NASCAR. This is a company that has its own legal department with half a dozen+ attorneys. On top of their own team working on this they have Winston-Salem attorney Paul Hendrick and his team. Also working in NASCAR’s favor is their unendingly deep pockets. They can afford to drag this case and their own case out for months. I highly doubt Mayfield can.
Long story short, I’m glad I’m not Jeremy Mayfield.
Loading ...
on Jun 19th, 2009 at 8:28 am
Regardless of the truth, I bet Jeremy’s wishing he simply entered a NASCAR reinstatement program right about now.
on Jun 19th, 2009 at 9:54 am
Mayfield taking on NASCAR full-throttle (no pun intended) really surprised me. If you’ve noticed in other sports, athletes accused of PEDs (or any drugs, really) rarely sue for things such as libel, or breach of contract against the league.
Why? Because they have to testify. And tell the truth.
So once a suspension is given, or a story breaks… the best they can do is shut up and stop talking to the press.
Who knows if Mayfield is right, but there’s no way he can win. He should have taken the easier loss- get the suspension down as much as possible and quietly deal with it.
on Jun 19th, 2009 at 1:18 pm
I don’t know what it was — and maybe (ok, most likely) this is totally unfair — but there was just something unsettling about how Mayfield and his girlfriend split up so many years ago (i.e., the publicity of it all). I don’t even remember what it was, but it just weirded me out at the time. Ever since then I was kinda “ehhh” about the guy.
It’s amazing how I subconsciously judge the guy’s character on something stupid like that.
Regarding this case, if he doesn’t have the truth on his side then he’s done for. The truth always comes out in the end.
on Jun 19th, 2009 at 1:47 pm
Journo…… You’re going to look pretty stupid when Mayfield wins this case in court.
on Jun 19th, 2009 at 1:58 pm
What happened to the JM that once drove the 98 for Cale Yarborough? He couldn’t get along with Rusty, threw his boss Ray Evernham under the bus and now takes on NA$CAR. Hmmm, wonder if the drugs fried his peice of standard issue grey matter?
on Jun 19th, 2009 at 2:10 pm
Overra88ted: Did you even read the post? More then anything Journo reviewed what Mayfield has gone through thus far, and then said he didn’t want to be him at this point. How is he going to look stupid IF Mayfield wins? It certainly doesn’t appear to me that Journo made a comment either way on what Mayfield did or didn’t do.
on Jun 19th, 2009 at 2:32 pm
Christopher, you hit o a key point, once accused/caught/busted your first responsibility is to yourself and your best course of action is to shut the hell up.
Mayfield has run his lips from the very first weekend at Lowes, and note, he did so at Lowes while breaking his suspension and had to be escorted off the premises. (not to mention refusal to enter a mandated rehabilitation program, that’s just flat-out dumb)
In his continuing exhalation of hot air he made the claim of taking a hair follicle test that would prove his innocence.
First of all a hair follicle test wouldn’t prove anything in his case and secondly why hasn’t the results of this “test” entered into evidence yet? More hot air I’m guessing.
Then we get to this so-called expert that claims the affidavit filed with his name attached was in error, he told a Mayfield lawyer of the errors and it was filed erroneously anyway.
Huh?!
That claim stinks to high heaven, if it contained errors at the time he signed it why was it ever handed to the Mayfield legal team in the first place?
As I said that excuse stinks, something’s very rotten.
I’d be the first to admit I came into this story with a bias based on his despicable actions during the Evernham lawsuit, that said I’ve also tried to be fair and looked at both sides.
I’ve called on personal experience as a drug councilor for the U.S. Navy and refreshed my memory by doing research on the drugs involved. Something 90% of the media hacks haven’t come close to thinking about let alone doing.
In summation Journo, you’re right, Mayfield is up to his neck but it’s in very large part due to his own actions despite what all the NASCAR conspiracy theorists think.
And BTW, the over/under bet on Mayfield filing for bankruptcy is 30 days.
on Jun 19th, 2009 at 2:33 pm
I think it has to at least be considered that Jeremy has now been branded as a meth user. That after all parties refused to disclose the unnamed, redacted, substance. One reporter, whose reporting has been questioned before, finds the facts that no one is privy to. Now supposedly several people have the evidence its meth. How and where did this come from? Oh, that’s right, a reporter won’t disclose his source! But because of that we now have it being passed as fact. BULL!
Jeremy had to have known the wrath of Daytona was going to come down on him if he bucked the lop sided system. But he was already branded as a drug user by NASCAR. In public opinion he had already lost pretty much everything, so why go quietly. In my feeble opinion I think he did what he felt he had to do to salvage even a part of his reputation. He had to try to prove he wasn’t what he was branded, is branded. I think if the same thing happened to most of us, we’d fight just as hard to regain our reputation.
But, NASCAR being the biggest bully in the land, never expected little Jeremy Mayfield to fight back or to defend himself. NASCAR uses an extremely heavy hammer to rule, not govern, rule this sport. They are pretty much mistake free and make sure of that. Does anyone really think their counter suit is anything other than laying on more of the bullying tactics? I’ve been in and around this sport since the late sixties and I’ve seen more BS and bad decisions and pure out to get ya’s from NASCAR just because they could.
I’m not especially a fan of Mayfields, but, in this case, I’d love to see him be proven right, in court, not a settlement like in the Grant deal. That hides too much! In this case I’d like to see Jeremy actually be found to be telling the truth and end up slapping the crap out of this third generation dictator in Daytona. I think I’d also like to see ESPN be made to reveal the source of their accusation of meth being the drug found.
I’m afraid Jeremy has already lost the battle, but, I wish him the very best. Between Carl Long, Jeremy, others, the show so far in 2009 has been stunk up by the Daytona posse and it will continue until the right battle is won.
on Jun 19th, 2009 at 2:33 pm
I wish the best for Jeremy. I’ve always liked him & I have no opinion of his guilt or innocence. However, I can’t help but wonder why he would sue NASCAR. Did he think he could bully them into reinstating him? His ship seems to be sinking & it’s a shame.
on Jun 19th, 2009 at 2:34 pm
TC & Journo-Doesn’t it just amaze you how some people simply just don’t read the content of your post?
As my Italian (Fiat/Chrysler friends might say) “Itsa gotta be frustrating asa hell!”
on Jun 19th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
Overra88ted… you base that assessment on what?
What in all that has been written gives you the slightest idea Mayfield will win anything?
on Jun 19th, 2009 at 5:19 pm
I think it is fair to say that Mayfield would not be in as much difficulty if he had FIRST tried to work things out within the NASCAR drug testing program as he first stated publicly he was going to do a day or 2 after his suspension was announced – at least then the assertion of his taking an illegal substance might never have gotten out. I’m not saying he should have just given in if he is innocent, but that he should have first tried to deal with the issue in private, not in the press. He definitely would have been better off to talk with a lawyer before making public statements.
I find it really eerie now to go back and read Marty Smith’s article about talking to Mayfield in the infield at LMS and how he described the way Mayfield was acting that night.
I still find it curious that I have seen no one in the NASCAR media write anything comparing the Mayfield situation to that of Manny Ramirez or Sammy Sosa.
What I have read here about the Mayfield situation has been more reasoned and more even-handed than at least 80% of what I have seen the professional media write.
on Jun 19th, 2009 at 5:27 pm
Overra88ted- Did you even read what I wrote? It was a recap of the legal proceedings against him and then I commented on how many legal issues he is now facing. From now on please the read the post before you spout off.
on Jun 19th, 2009 at 10:08 pm
Journo…. Mark my words, Mayfield WILL win this case, this is all about Na$crap’s inept drug policy and a false positive.
on Jun 20th, 2009 at 1:22 am
Overa88ted- That is fine if you feel that way. But please read the post before accusing me of anything. As I very clearly wrote in the post this had nothing to with his guilt or innocence. I am guessing you missed that because you didn’t read it. I don’t appreciate name calling, as I am sure you wouldn’t appreciate it if it was directed it at you. Think before you write.
on Jun 20th, 2009 at 5:25 am
Overra88ted, you state as fact what you can’t possibly know is true.
Unless… you have some super-duper, decoder-ring type, and unimpeachable, source that says he returned a false positive.
Facts work, hot air is just that.
on Jun 20th, 2009 at 12:16 pm
TC, Jurno, I agree with you 100% I would hate to be in JM posistion right now. If JM attorny would think about their straigy, to help their client it would be very simple to have the court to do a baseline clean drug test, then have JM take the meds that he stated he took that created the positive test, wait one hour , retest him and see what the results are. This would prove who is right and who is wrong. It that simple. If they continue to let this trial go on, NASCAR will force JM into BK due to their unlimited resources. That appears to be NASCAR’s motive at this point in time. NASCAR does not care if they were right or wrong when they suspended him. It’s NASCAR defending their drug policy. It does not matter who NASCAR hurts along the way, It’s all about NASCAR winning.
The law suit from Triad should be against the JMR Corporation, not JM so that suit should not hurt him personally or financially. I know cash must be getting tight for him, no racing,no income lost sponsors. Very sad situation. Its the last place I would want to be. The saddest thing overall is NASCAR has already won and they have not been to trial yet.
on Jun 20th, 2009 at 2:42 pm
OT….And you expect an intelligent response from a guy with a name like Over88ated? LOL
I’m just amazed he posted about something other than Junior. Those one note wonders with the stupid user names are usually so obsessed with posting hate about Junior that they rarely post about anything else.
Back OT, I think this has been just fascinating watching it unfold. If JM is innocent, I wish him well but things do not look good for him. When you take on a huge org like NASCAR, you have to have tons of $ and I’m doubting he has the deep pockets NASCAR has. He may “win” but he’ll be ruined financially (and probably a really old man by then!)
on Jun 20th, 2009 at 5:50 pm
stevec, just what do you think a “clean baseline” test and an additional test will do?
You are assuming the positive test result was due to the combo of drugs he claims to have taken.
Read the science, that combo isn’t possible to create a false positive.
If you don’t understand what drug tests can tell you, here’s an excellent primer on the subject.
As far as responsibility in the TRT lawsuit, who do you think the “JMR Corporation” is?
Mayfield owns it, to claim the “corporation” should be responsible and not the owner is nonsensical.
on Jun 20th, 2009 at 8:23 pm
marc – generally speaking, the debts & liabilities of a corporation (or LLC) remain the debts & liabilities of the corporation. They do not pass-through to the shareholders of the corporation.
Assuming Jeremy and Shana have not done anything that would allow TRT (or any other claimants) to pierce the corporate veil, then steve is correct, this would cause no direct impact on Jeremy personally.
If shareholders were liable, then the millions of shareholders of GM would have been on the hook for all of its debts & liabilities. There would be no need for corporate bankruptcies.
Check your business law books on that one.
on Jun 21st, 2009 at 12:56 am
Its late and I’m a bit tired but…. Yes there can be a false positive in Nascar’s testing methods. Nascar asked specifically if he had taken Vick’s inhaler, that drug will give a positive on 2 types, 1 legal, 1 illegal. So will clatirion. addall(sp) will test positive as an illegal drug.
That tends to lean towards Nascar having a result for both types in his system.
So in that respect JM is correct, Nascar is correct if JM did not inform Dr Black that he was taking it ahead of time. but it can be argued that if no list was given, JM had no reasonable idea that it was illegal.
I’m carefully watching and reading to see how this shakes out.
I agree Nascar is now soley defending its drug policy and will fight to prove it self at any cost.
AS far as the bashing on JM over previous employment, and bashing on the drug issue. It seems as many who chose to post haven’t read the articles, or any of the follow ups.
JM was correct in suing Everham, he was removed from the car for before his contract was up. was he wrong for publicly calling his boss out? yes IMO, but in the end what JM said was true.
If I were JM would I fight? if I was innocent I would.
I have personally been falsely charge with a OWI(DWI,OMWI,etc) I fought it. the charge cost my job, respect of my friends and in the end my marriage. The state delayed and drug the case out for over 1 year, I did win the case(withdrawn 2 days before trial). I never repaired the damage the charge cost me, nor the legal fee’s.
Would you take the easy road if you were JM? admit to something you didn’t do?
on Jun 21st, 2009 at 10:09 am
Marc, baseline drug tests are done all the time, NASCAR did a baseline test in January on all the teams and drivers.
If the Court was to order a baseline test, it should show a clean test, therefore the second drug test after the meds and the over the counter meds in the same dosage claimed should reflect the same result NASCAR used to suspend JM.
If it does not come back with the same result NASCAR was correct, if it does provide the same result, JM proves science wrong and should be found not guility and reinstated to NASCAR. Its all in the name of evedence in the court of law.
its all very simple, Thanks Knob, excellent explnation regarding LLC.
on Jun 21st, 2009 at 4:24 pm
Thinking back through the Mayfield years, it seems to me that Jeremy has always been somewhat of a hothead who’s had a problem with temper tantrums in front of the media, and one who lets his alligator mouth override his hummingbird brain. These are not symptoms of ADHD. So now, I too have to wonder, if it’s been a long term drug problem.
I’ve had experience fighting BIG money corporations in court. Rule of thumb is- you can’t win against money bigger than what you have.
I doubt he’s innocent. I think he doth protest too much. The evidence will prove the case.
on Jun 22nd, 2009 at 2:50 pm
knobcreekfan – What you claim is only true if there are more than one owner as part of an LLC. (Limited Liability Company BTW as opposed to limited liability corporation as many commonly call it.)
A LLC member’s liability to repay its obligations is limited to his or her capital contribution. Do you know what Mayfield’s “contribution is?”
on Jun 22nd, 2009 at 3:10 pm
stevec – You very clearly didn’t make a single effort to read the two links I provided.
A baseline test given to Mayfield now is worthless in determining what, or if he was dirty over a month ago.
The ONLY thing a test given now, and presumably show, is Mayfield is clean now as he was in the pre-season test.
Amphetamines can only be detected via a urine test for 2-5 days after use, so can you explain what a test now would show?
Methamphetamine, if the leaked report is true, can only be detected 3-6 days after use.
So again, what would a test now show?
on Jun 22nd, 2009 at 9:24 pm
marc – as I said earlier…”generally speaking, the debts & liabilities of a corporation (or LLC) remain the debts & liabilities of the corporation. They do not pass-through to the shareholders of the corporation.”
Yes, the rules for LLC are slightly different than for a corp. But they are generally the same. Plus, as steve stated, Mayfield Motorsports Inc is a corporation. Accordingly, saying Jeremy (assuming Jeremy IS a shareholder of MMI) is not personally liable for any possible liability generated from a lawsuit is not “nonsensical.”
on Jun 23rd, 2009 at 3:16 am
knobcreekfan – And I’ll say again, show me where Mayfield isn’t the sole owner of the race team.
For him to magically make a team appear from nowhere on such short notice, and also to have more than himself and his wife as “share-holders” is highly unlikely.
He didn’t form his team , that operates out of Billy Stavola’s shop, until a month before the Daytona 500 I’d bet my dollar to your Krispy Kreme he and Shana are sole owners.
In short, he’s screwed with a capital “S” and my over/under bet on bankruptcy is 30 days.
on Jun 23rd, 2009 at 8:09 am
marc – and I’ll say again, Mayfield Motorsports, Inc is a corporation. Say it with me….cor-por-a-tion. It is simply irrelevant if he is the sole shareholder or he has 1000 other shareholders. He enjoys the same protection from personal liability. If you disagree with me, please show me a NC statute stating otherwise.
And not that it matters as 1) I could have a corporation setup by tomorrow and 2) the presence or lack of equipment, cars, shop, etc does not matter regarding the existence of the corportaion, but Mayfield Motorsports, Inc was formed 12/15/1994. I would not call that magically appearing.
Now, I am not saying he is not screwed. That was the whole point of the article…I would hate to be in JM’s shoes. However, the TRT lawsuit will not impact him financially on a personal level and is not the cause of the screwing. Which is your contention.
I say he is screwed because his career was down the tubes to begin with. He has failed a drug test (rightly or wrongly). He has lost what sponsors he did have. If he proves NASCAR wrong or he goes through their treatment program – he is still going to have a hard time getting new sponsors. He has legal bills coming out his ***. He has no soource of income. Again, I would hate to be in his shoes.
Now, your over/under bet…since you are saying JM is personally liable for all of this, am I correct in assuming the bet is JM’s personal bankruptcy? Also, since you have to choose either over OR under for the bet, am I also correct in assuming you are taking the under?
on Jun 23rd, 2009 at 8:17 am
marc – and on the testing…you are not really testing for amphetamines or meth or anything else as you normally would test for in a normal random test. What you are testing is if the drug combination JM says he took will cause the same results again. It is a standard principle of science….great, you made it do that once…now replicate it and prove it was not a fluke.
He takes the baseline and presumably tests clean. He takes whatever combination of meds he contends…if he said he had a mountain dew & a tic-tac, give him a mountain dew and a tic-tac too. You wait the necessary time for those to get into his blood stream and test again. I do not know how long that time frame is, but keep him under absolute supervision until then. If the results come back the same as the NASCAR test, then he proves the current test is a false positive. If they come back different than the NASCAR results, he is proved wrong.
on Jun 23rd, 2009 at 3:43 pm
knobcreekfan – <em”Mayfield Motorsports, Inc is a corporation. Say it with me….cor-por-a-tion. It is simply irrelevant if he is the sole shareholder or he has 1000 other shareholders.”
“Say it with me….” “A, L. L. C. m. e. m. b. e. r. ’s liability to repay its obligations is limited to his or her capital contribution.
Do you know what Mayfield’s “contribution is?” Given the fly-by-night and sudden appearance of the race team I’m betting something far north of 50% which put him on the hook in any lawsuits.
knobcreekfan – “What you are testing is if the drug combination JM says he took will cause the same results again. It is a standard principle of science”
I see you mimicking “stevec” by not reading the links provided.
Mayfied alleges the combination of Claritin and Adderall caused a positive Amphetamine result.
Read about d-methamphetamine and i-methamphetamine.
Additionally current testing methods allow testers to rule out prescription drugs as the source of the positive results.
on Jun 23rd, 2009 at 5:05 pm
marc – please. You can talk about LLC’s and members and their contributions all you want. Mayfield Motorsports, Inc (notice the “inc” in the name) is a cor-por-a-tion. Again, it does not matter, but MMI was formed in 1994…that is not “sudden appearance.”
marc – please open your mind a little….just a little. I understand the science involved and how chemical makeups are different, etc, etc… In theory, the combination he says he took should not cause the results that are there. I get that.
However (and here is where you need to open your mind for just a minute), the thought of performing this test is to prove “current testing methods” and that sciene wrong. Remember, at one time in our history, the sun revolved around Earth and the Earth was not round. And then guys like Capernicus & Magellan came along.
Again – “Now, your over/under bet…since you are saying JM is personally liable for all of this, am I correct in assuming the bet is JM’s personal bankruptcy? Also, since you have to choose either over OR under for the bet, am I also correct in assuming you are taking the under?”
on Jun 23rd, 2009 at 5:34 pm
I believe it is entirely possible that Jeremy may have no personal liability AS a shareholder of the corporation or owner or member of the LLC involved except for the capital he contributed to the entity. However, it is common for those extending credit to a new or small LLC or corporation to require the owner to guarantee the obligation of the LLC or corporation – so Jeremy might be on the hook personally as guarantor rather than as the owner of the entity involved.
on Jun 24th, 2009 at 3:02 pm
knobcreekfan – “Remember, at one time in our history, the sun revolved around Earth and the Earth was not round. And then guys like Capernicus & Magellan came along.”
I’m supposed to rely on wild assed theorys and guesswork?
And by extension the courts hearing his case will also?
That shyster Mayfield hired that filed a fake resume might go that route but I’m not.
on Jun 25th, 2009 at 10:04 pm
knobcreekfan – certain companies make small corporations have an officer or large share-holder give a personal guarantee on some debts. So, without knowing whether or not Triad or BDR granted credit to the corporation alone, or if Mayfield had to give a personal guarantee, it’s not 100% sure he can just bankrupt the race team and walk away scott free. Chances are he can as to that debt, but a personal guarantee is always a possibilty – and if he financed a hauler or other equipment – there’s almost definitely a personal guarantee on that.
It’s not always so simple.
on Jun 26th, 2009 at 8:53 am
Ellen – I know all about personal guarantees…have one myself. I also know things are not always simple. I once worked with a group that was a 2-car team, but had 29 different corps/llc to limit liability and protect assets. I also know about piercing the corporate veil…I have successfully pierced some.
As I said originally, “generally speaking, the debts & liabilities of a corporation (or LLC) remain the debts & liabilities of the corporation. They do not pass-through to the shareholders of the corporation.” Note how I said “generally speaking” allowing for those types of possibilities.
I REALLY do not want to rehash the conversation and I am sure whatever I say, marc is going to claim is wrong, nonsense or “wild assed theorys and guesswork.” But WAY back…marc stated to steve that, “Mayfield owns it, to claim the ‘corporation’ should be responsible and not the owner is nonsensical.”
My point then was that steve’s claim – “The law suit from Triad should be against the JMR Corporation, not JM so that suit should not hurt him personally or financially.” – was not nonsense. Nonsense – “words or language having no meaning or conveying no intelligible ideas.”
Note, steve specifically addressed the Triad lawsuit. Not any other loans/liabilities of MMI.
Now, I have not seen the actual court documents (if someone has a link – I would love to read it), but in none of the articles I have seen does it state that TRT & BDR have sued Jeremy personally – just the corporation. One would assume that IF they had personal guarantees from Jeremy (or had attached to personal assets of Jeremy), they would have sued Jeremy personally and not just the corporation. Accordingly, either 1) TRT/BDR attorneys did a bad job in preparing the suit or 2) they do not have a personal guarantee.
Which gets me back to “the law suit from Triad should be against the JMR Corporation, not JM so that suit should not hurt him personally or financially” is not nonsense.
on Jun 26th, 2009 at 9:39 am
marc – “knobcreekfan – ‘Remember, at one time in our history, the sun revolved around Earth and the Earth was not round. And then guys like Capernicus & Magellan came along.’
I’m supposed to rely on wild assed theorys and guesswork?”
I could always tell you are pretty set in your ways, but I had no idea you thought the Earth being round was a “wild assed theory.” For those of you in California…watch your step, you are getting close to the edge.
on Jun 26th, 2009 at 6:04 pm
Um, no. That would be wild assed theorys and guesswork that preceded Capernicus & Magellan.
Sorry you missed that. Really.
As you probably know by now Mayfield’s latest court filings (Thursday) pretty much confirms the drug found was Meth.
Now the question is will ESPN’s two sources be hauled into court for violation the gag order.